Foreigners don’t know how the American political system works. Most Americans don’t know how the system works and those who come close by revealing unpleasant truths about the presidential election process are often called kooks or conspiracy theorists. Many truths lie in the checkered history of election rigging, American style. Motives and capabilities of the players are the keys to unlocking the political world of 2016.
One unpleasant truth about our presidential election process is that the Media tabulates the vote. It had to do something with a power shift after the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963 when News Election Service was created. Many years later, the long Reagan era compelled the Left to shake up the old election process by cultivating a candidate that could neutralize conservative votes.When Ross Perot started winning, things got out of hand and the flame created by the Media was quickly extinguished. The threat of Ross Perot and the Reform Party exposed the need to create, formalize, and perfect an alternation of power protocol between Republicans and Democrats. Election 2000 provided a crisis by which a mechanism could be found to perfect and formalize the mischief. The solution was “touch screen,” a modifiable electronic impulse that replaced paper ballots.
The inner sanctums of the Media’s skunk works had finally produced a deterrent to the Right. With the appropriation of the vote count, a rig was possible in two forms: a “hard rig” by which the actual numbers are adjusted and a “soft rig” that manipulates the circumstances of the election process (polls), in short, stacking the deck. However, the newly established capabilities produced the dilemma of whether or not to use the options. One could always just let the election “ride” in order to preserve the illusion of a lawful election process and not offend Republicans. In other words, don’t overplay your hand.
I suggest that a woman is likely to be elected President in 2016 by a soft rig of the nomination process that not only guarantees Hillary Clinton the Democrat nomination, but also one that introduces a female dark horse Republican who will come out of the male pack to win their nomination. Either way, the Left wins another battle in its utopian quest to reshape America.
So who will be the first woman President of the United States? It’s not likely to be Hillary Clinton; that would violate the Alternation of Power Protocols. She won’t be black because we’ve already had a black President. A Margaret Thatcher type would suggest a viable and attractive candidate most acceptable to Republicans. Even if it is a woman of a lesser standing, she can still win the nomination after the polls are adjusted in the manner I believe they were with the current President. Feminists will be placated just because a female broke through the glass ceiling. I suggest that plans are in the making for more updated television shows that condition us to accept the inevitability of a female President.They might even be tailor made for a particular individual – perhaps Hispanic, but it really won’t matter because the result will still be Madame President.
