Mickey Mouse, President 2016?

I have no doubt Barack Obama’s election in 2008 was an engineered one where favorable Media stories and polls conditioned the populace to accept the final numbers (rig).  It’s part of the War of the World’s Capability the Media has developed over the years and what independent investigative reporters Jim and Kenneth Collier warned us about in their book, Votescam and more recently written about by Mark Crispin Miller in his 2005 book, Fooled Again.  The temptation to create Presidents and appropriate the election process was just too much so long as the illusion of an alternation of power was preserved.  It’s not inconceivable to me that a dead man, a Martian, or even Mickey Mouse could be elected President in 2016 by hackers who could hack the hackers who made George W. Bush President in 2000.  Could Mickey win?

 Of course the government would say, “No way.” Americans also have the NSA’s assurance that their massive surveillance and data mining operations contain no specifics on them; trust us, we’re from the government.  We’re from the IRS, trust us.  International bank hacking is big business and it rakes in hundreds of millions of dollars by Russian gangs who turn out to be more clever than officials thought. Recently, Russia has announced major purchases of typewriters for their government and security apparatus.  The penetration of Iran’s nuclear program by hostile foreign government hackers is well known.  With all the indicators, it’s not illogical to assume that individuals or groups of electronic geniuses are already planning a spectacular event in 2016. 

Hackers would risk nothing because even if Mickey was elected President, an investigation would never occur because of national security considerations or corporate proprietary guarantees on the software and procedures of Associated Press, the private business that tabulates the vote.  Besides, vote fraud carries no death penalty (yet) and so what if they’re caught?  They’d probably be offered cushy security jobs.  It’s not likely that members of the ruling class will blow the lid off of one of America’s dirtiest secrets.  When was the last time you heard how your vote is actually tabulated? 

So who might Anonymous pick for the rig?  A dark horse win would be less dramatic and easily explained; there’s always a string of filers no one knows about.  A write-in victory for someone (something?) farfetched like Mickey Mouse in 2016 would expose the whole charade, the ultimate hacker’s dream.  

Could the tabulation monopoly of the Associated Press be compromised?  Will the days of centralized electronic vote tabulation by mysterious people, processes, and agendas come to an end?  Will there be a return to paper ballots and see-though ballot boxes?  That would mean an end to the Media’s biggest trump card, the control of the tabulation process and an end to their insatiable drive for power.  Mickey Mouse winning the U.S Presidency could very well be the greatest anti-establishment coup in American history against the hackers who in 2000 perfected the national vote tabulation rig by the new technology that created PCs and the modem.

Rethinking One-Man One-Vote

The moral and industrious majority in America has always affirmed the belief in the concept of majority rule in elections whose precedent goes back to Greece and the voting record of the 35 tribes of Rome. When most of the population believes in the election process, all is well. It didn’t even take a leap of faith for most to have revered those who guarded and preserved that process when the U.S., settled by the English, was temporarily galvanized into a reasonable defined homogeneous nation by its melting pot.  Few challenged the concept or its rules.

The key to understanding the problem of one-man, one-vote now is who votes and who doesn’t.  After years of rigged elections the center collapsed and with it the Silent Majority.  Two extremes are left: predatory capitalism and socialism. The majority dropped out and the majority voting now is the minority.  It’s an interesting state of affairs and how it got that way is even more interesting because the trouble with the Silent Majority is they are silent – so silent to the point where the relentless toxic activities of the worst elements has made the latter dominant.  

 

The precedent for adding votes to contributing individuals is there.  When the crimes of individuals become egregious, they lose their right to vote.  Shouldn’t the constructive efforts of the best elements be rewarded? Is it too much to give those with military service an extra vote?  After all, they risk their lives defending the framework from which all the goodies for the worst elements flow.  That’s not to say most Americans do not contribute, but the numbers and activities of the worst elements are always disproportional to the numbers of constructive individuals.  A businessman should get an extra vote because he employs others in the same manner as a nobleman guides the affairs of his manor.  America is, after all, a collective endeavor of all those estates run by a president – the chief business agent for the country.

 

So what does it boil down too even if the election process is rigged?  At least the new system would acknowledge the contributions of the best elements.  It’s also not a reaction to the browning of America because the idea of rewarding those who build and preserve any country is a universal one. All colors comprise the best elements.  The inevitable results of one-man, one-vote is socialism or worse when incentive takes a back seat to political commissars intent on playing God and who will justify their abuses by a representation based on the dead weight of the masses.  When the new majority is proclaimed by the worst elements, it will be an artificial one.